Citrus Growers Forum Index Citrus Growers Forum

This is the read-only version of the Citrus Growers Forum.

Breaking news: the Citrus Growers Forum is reborn from its ashes!

Citrus Growers v2.0

Grafting in my small non commercial Florida Citrus grove????
Goto Previous  1, 2
 
Citrus Growers Forum Index du Forum -> In ground citrus
Author Message
Darkman
Citruholic
Citruholic


Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 968
Location: Pensacola Florida South of I-10 Zone 8b/9a

Posted: Sun 04 Mar, 2012 3:17 am

Chris wrote:
This is pretty silly. Are you asking a question or picking a fight Darkman?


Chris I fail to see where the individual rights of an individual being taken are silly. I'm not sure where you felt that I may be picking a fight and with whom. What I really wanted was an open discussion of the current State and Federal laws and regulations concerning Citrus propagation in the State of Florida, I also asked if anyone knew where there were laws/rules that specifically mentioned homeowners. I was very serious. What is common knowledge is not always accurate when it comes to the interpretation of laws that are frequently written in obscure and ambiguous Legalese. So far no one has said that the way the laws/rules are written clearly means they are referring to a homeowner. Several have said how it is being interpreted by the authorities and as Dr. Manners stated I might win a legal battle but only after many years and the expenditure of a lot of money. I'm sorry that you feel that I have an ulterior motive.

Chris wrote:
Are the rewards of grafting a few of your backyard trees worth the risk of spreading the most serious citrus desease in the world to farmers in Florida and potentially affecting a billion dollar industry?


I live about 400 miles from the commercial citrus areas. I don’t think my grafting of healthy trees with equally healthy budwood would be of any threat to the Citrus industry. As a point of context, Hershell lives many miles closer to the Florida commercial citrus area. If the Feds really thought that homeowner grafting was a serious threat to the Florida Citrus don’t you think they would stop at least the southern half of Georgia from grafting. I mean we are talking about a billion dollar industry! Right?

I hope that I was clear that I will not violate the propagation laws/rules irregardless of how I feel.

Chris wrote:
If you have that many trees you should have more than enough fruit and varieties anyhow...


Chris I am blessed to have been able to buy some vacant lots that adjoined my property and that is what this is about. It is not the quantity of trees; it is about the lack of land. I grow many other types of fruit trees and I don’t have a lot of spaces left to plant in. If I could graft I could have multi-variety trees that would free up space for more fruit trees. Also there are many varieties that are not available in Florida any more that once were. The reason for this is the current laws/rules that are in place. The industry is not geared for the homeowner. It is for the Citrus industry. Lazz has several varieties I would love to have but can not. Do you really think his trees are a threat to Florida? Like I have said before, they threw a blanket over the problem and maybe they needed to do that to get control of the situation however the restrictions could be revisited now.

Chris wrote:
I hope you enjoy them Very Happy


I do! I’ll enjoy them more when they are old enough to produce more than one or two fruit. Smile

If I have offended you I apologize as that was not my intent and I hope that this will clarify my intentions.

_________________
Charles in Pensacola

Life - Some assembly required, As is no warranty, Batteries not included, Instructions shipped separately and are frequently wrong!

Kentucky Bourbon - It may not solve the problem but it helps to make it tolerable!
Back to top
Millet
Citruholic
Citruholic


Joined: 13 Nov 2005
Posts: 6657
Location: Colorado

Posted: Mon 05 Mar, 2012 12:54 am

Talking about Florida's many disease problems. Is there no answer on the many abandon citrus groves with in the state, and what Florida is doing about it?

Florida worries so much about the little home owner tree, but looks the other way when it comes to the many diseased and abandon citrus groves.

Does this make any sense? - Millet (322 BO-)
Back to top
Laaz
Site Owner
Site Owner


Joined: 12 Nov 2005
Posts: 5664
Location: Dorchester County, South Carolina

Posted: Mon 05 Mar, 2012 1:42 am

Makes no sense at all...

_________________
Wal-Mart a great place to buy cheap plastic crap ! http://walmartwatch.com/ ...

Back to top
Malcolm_Manners
Citrus Guru
Citrus Guru


Joined: 13 Nov 2005
Posts: 676
Location: Lakeland Florida

Posted: Mon 05 Mar, 2012 10:39 am

Respected friends: I am hesitant to write anything here, realizing there is the possibility of hurting feelings or insulting someone, and I don't want to do that. I really do consider all of you to be respected friends. But I think something should perhaps be said, in that the direction of this thread bothers me. What we seem to have is quite a few out-of-state folks poo-poo-ing the efforts of all of us silly, ignorant, stupid, mindless idiots in Florida who try ineptly to grow citrus. Has it really not occurred to us here on the forum that Florida growers and State agencies are very, very well aware of the issues being brought up here, and are already doing absolutely everything in their power to deal with those issues? Yes, there are abandoned groves -- not to the degree that the picture painted here would indicate, but quite a lot. In some cases, grower groups have invested their own money to have those groves sprayed along with their own (especially in the block psyllid spraying efforts). To the degree that they legally can, the State condemns such properties, fines the owners, and/or goes to other legal efforts to get the groves either rehabilitated or razed. But as with all things legal, such actions take time.

I certainly agree that the situation is problematic, but the insults to the State's or the growers' logic and actions is bothering me -- it really isn't warranted.

Respectfully, and hoping you'll try to see our side of this.

Malcolm
Back to top
Malcolm_Manners
Citrus Guru
Citrus Guru


Joined: 13 Nov 2005
Posts: 676
Location: Lakeland Florida

Posted: Mon 05 Mar, 2012 10:48 am

A few further thoughts: Epidemiologically, and abandoned grove, regardless of size, can be thought of as a single point, and that point is not moving. Important considerations. In that sense, a single small rooted cutting from Uncle Bob's yard, 2 counties away, carried to my yard and planted, is FAR more effective in moving the disease, than is that thousand-acre abandoned grove just down the road.
Back to top
Laaz
Site Owner
Site Owner


Joined: 12 Nov 2005
Posts: 5664
Location: Dorchester County, South Carolina

Posted: Mon 05 Mar, 2012 11:40 am

Dr. Manners, I don't think anyone is calling anyone silly, ignorant, stupid or mindless idiots. We are just trying to make sense of the situation.

_________________
Wal-Mart a great place to buy cheap plastic crap ! http://walmartwatch.com/ ...

Back to top
Millet
Citruholic
Citruholic


Joined: 13 Nov 2005
Posts: 6657
Location: Colorado

Posted: Mon 05 Mar, 2012 2:00 pm

If one looks through this thread, no where will it be found, the words "silly, ignorant, stupid, mindless idiots". I would think that HLB's disease dispersal depends not so much on the actual size of an abandoned grove, but rather on the number of abandoned groves, and their many different locations spread across Florida's commercial citrus area. I'm not sure how far a psyllid flies, but since it was first discovered in Florida, the psyllid can now be found all along the gulf coast and into California. What percentage of this can be traced to Uncle Bob's tree, vs the millions of commercial trees? From what I read over the course of this outbreak, right or wrong, the commercial grower would rather prefer that there were no private citrus trees at all. To be honest, if I personally had a large commercial grove at stake in Florida, I might also carry this perspective. . Whatever, it is hoped that these restrictions will slow the advance of the disease, but will of course not stop it. Finding a cure or resistance , which I believe will be found, now that American University, and government scientist are involved will be found. I'm not totally ignorant of Florida, as I lived in Daytona Beach for a while, my oldest son graduated from Embry Riddle Aeronautical University in Daytona Beach- Millet (321 AB0-)
Back to top
Malcolm_Manners
Citrus Guru
Citrus Guru


Joined: 13 Nov 2005
Posts: 676
Location: Lakeland Florida

Posted: Mon 05 Mar, 2012 8:38 pm

Oh oh, I've offended. I'm sorry. No, I'm not saying anyone actually said we were stupid, ignorant, etc.; rather, the tone of the thread (and others) seems to be that individuals in other parts of the world know more about and have more wisdom about Florida citrus than do our thousands of growers or our department of agriculture, or our UF research centers, or any of the other tens of thousands of people so intimately involved in this industry. It seems to me that any time we come upon one of those "it just doesn't make sense" statements, it indicates an unfortunate lack of understanding the real reasons behind something. I'm sure I must do that too, elsewhere. I'm not an epidemiologist; but I do teach plant pathology and entomology, and it really does make total sense to me to worry far more about moving home-dooryard trees than about non-moving abandoned groves.

I know a lot of commercial growers (many of the better ones of whom are my graduates) and I've never met one who didn't want dooryard trees around -- they nearly always have a favorite 'Minneola' or 'Page' or 'King' or 'Ponkan' or 'Triumph' in their own back yard.

It does seem likely to me that at some point in the not-too-distant future, there may be few or no back yard citrus trees left, simply because preventing greening is too much of a hassle for the average gardener to actually do.

Well, again, I'm sorry if I've stepped on any toes. As stated earlier, you folks are respected friends here. But FWIW, from my point of view, I don't perceive actions of the FDACS, USDA, etc., to be in any way senseless or unwise, or anything less than exactly what they can and should do, within the limits of the law.
Back to top
Mark_T
Citruholic
Citruholic


Joined: 30 Jun 2009
Posts: 757
Location: Gilbert,AZ

Posted: Tue 06 Mar, 2012 12:14 am

If it gets to the point where a homeowner cannot own a tree, then likely the war is already lost. I don't like the idea that they would even consider such a thing myself, but that's for another forum I suppose.

As long as it's legal to own a citrus tree on your home, it should be legal obtain "clean" budwood and propagate on ones own property. I'm not saying there shouldn't be restrictions, just that there should at least be some avenue if one really desired to do so.

Maybe I'm missing something here, but what is the danger if the wood is state certified, pathogen free? Dr Manners care to jump in here? I presume the source wood is the same as nursery stock.
Back to top
Millet
Citruholic
Citruholic


Joined: 13 Nov 2005
Posts: 6657
Location: Colorado

Posted: Tue 06 Mar, 2012 12:29 am

Dr. Manners, at least you did not step on my toes. My skin is much thicker than that. Members of this forum should always feel free to state any point of view that they believe to be correct, and an asset to others. Never worry about other toes Dr. Manners I have long enjoyed, and valued your posting. I would suspect, right or wrong, that some of the disagreement is due to the fact that those of us who are Americans don't much like being told what we must do. Regards, Millet (321 ABo)
Back to top
Darkman
Citruholic
Citruholic


Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 968
Location: Pensacola Florida South of I-10 Zone 8b/9a

Posted: Tue 06 Mar, 2012 1:07 am

Malcolm_Manners wrote:
But I think something should perhaps be said, in that the direction of this thread bothers me. Malcolm


With the wide diverse group of people we have here, especially with all the different government ideologies, I’m surprised at how mild the comments are. I welcome all comments and have defended the state on a few of them. What a person thinks and expresses on this topic or any other within the guidelines of decency is what makes America free and great. Please don’t take it personally or as an attack on what you believe is righteous. If you wish, defend your thoughts, as you have been doing with facts.

Malcolm_Manners wrote:
Has it really not occurred to us here on the forum that Florida growers and State agencies are very, very well aware of the issues being brought up here, and are already doing absolutely everything in their power to deal with those issues? Malcolm


Well I believe that you are half right! As I have expressed earlier in this thread I believe it is not only their right it is their responsibility to protect the citizens, property and economy of this state. Here is the half I don’t think they have a clue about. My rights as a homeowner. They are primarily focused on the industry. Along with their responsibility to protect the citizens, property and economy of this state they are charged to do it equally and fairly which this set of rules/laws clearly does not. When the problem was first addressed and they needed a hardcore emergency response I believe they acted responsibly. As time has passed it is the states responsibility to back away from any impinged rights and restore them as they can. I do not believe they are even considering this or that they even acknowledge there is an issue. So No. I do not believe that Florida growers and State agencies are very, very well aware of the issues being brought up here, and are already doing absolutely everything in their power to deal with those issues? Some of the issues but not all of them and especially not the issue that I focused on with my first post.

Malcolm_Manners wrote:
…To the degree that they legally can, the State condemns such properties, fines the owners, and/or goes to other legal efforts to get the groves either rehabilitated or razed. But as with all things legal, such actions take time. Malcolm


and so they should and maybe they need more legislation to streamline the practice when it involves a significant threat HOWEVER it may be that the science doesn’t support the desire to eradicate all of these plants. It is interesting that the original “scorched earth policy” taken towards solving the problem may have succeeded had it not been for a judge saying, hold on, this is unconstitutional and it violates the rights of the citizen. It is a two edged sword. We’ll never know if the eradication would have been successful since the judge ordered a stay on the program.

Malcolm_Manners wrote:
I certainly agree that the situation is problematic, but the insults to the State's or the growers' logic and actions is bothering me -- it really isn't warranted. Malcolm

Hmmm maybe but let’s not stifle the dissenting opinion just because some may not say it as eloquently as you might. I believe that most who have expressed a negative view of the situation are mainly upset with the violation of the individual’s rights.

Malcolm_Manners wrote:
Respectfully, and hoping you'll try to see our side of this. Malcolm


I do but I think it is the time for improvement

Malcolm_Manners wrote:
A few further thoughts: Epidemiologically, and abandoned grove, regardless of size, can be thought of as a single point, and that point is not moving. Important considerations. In that sense, a single small rooted cutting from Uncle Bob's yard, 2 counties away, carried to my yard and planted, is FAR more effective in moving the disease, than is that thousand-acre abandoned grove just down the road. Malcolm


I completely understand you logic and it is for that reason early on in the thread that I stated transporting Citrus trees is not the issue. I completely agree with that ruling as it would be impractical and enormously expensive for the state to pay for the inspections and administration of a program to allow transportation of trees. In all fairness to taxpayers the state should not be responsible for paying and there is no way that a citizen could pay it. In the ideal world the right would be there but it would include that the person exercising the right be responsible for the cost of the right.

Malcolm_Manners wrote:
I'm not an epidemiologist; but I do teach plant pathology and entomology, and it really does make total sense to me to worry far more about moving home-dooryard trees than about non-moving abandoned groves. Malcolm


I agree Don’t Move Citrus Trees! But by now the state should have a plan to distribute budwood and seeds that guarantees disease free products. As far as I know, and I am not in the loop, there are no plans to set this up. What harm would/come come from my use of state certified budwood on my trees on my property. I could not spread disease since I’m not transporting anything Citrus.

Malcolm_Manners wrote:
It does seem likely to me that at some point in the not-too-distant future, there may be few or no back yard citrus trees left, simply because preventing greening is too much of a hassle for the average gardener to actually do. Malcolm


I sincerely hope you are wrong. I have to believe that a cure/solution is on the horizon.

Malcolm_Manners wrote:
I don't perceive actions of the FDACS, USDA, etc., to be in any way senseless or unwise, or anything less than exactly what they can and should do, within the limits of the law. Malcolm


Unless what they are doing is unconstitutional but then that wouldn’t be within the limits of the law would it. Until a constitutional challenge is raised we won’t know.

Dr. Manners I appreciate your involvement and it was you that said that I might win in a court case.

_________________
Charles in Pensacola

Life - Some assembly required, As is no warranty, Batteries not included, Instructions shipped separately and are frequently wrong!

Kentucky Bourbon - It may not solve the problem but it helps to make it tolerable!
Back to top
Laaz
Site Owner
Site Owner


Joined: 12 Nov 2005
Posts: 5664
Location: Dorchester County, South Carolina

Posted: Fri 09 Mar, 2012 11:49 am

So is it also illegal to plant seeds & grow seedlings ?

_________________
Wal-Mart a great place to buy cheap plastic crap ! http://walmartwatch.com/ ...

Back to top
Darkman
Citruholic
Citruholic


Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 968
Location: Pensacola Florida South of I-10 Zone 8b/9a

Posted: Fri 09 Mar, 2012 12:55 pm

Laaz wrote:
So is it also illegal to plant seeds & grow seedlings ?


Very much so based upon their interpretation of the rules/laws!

_________________
Charles in Pensacola

Life - Some assembly required, As is no warranty, Batteries not included, Instructions shipped separately and are frequently wrong!

Kentucky Bourbon - It may not solve the problem but it helps to make it tolerable!
Back to top
Laaz
Site Owner
Site Owner


Joined: 12 Nov 2005
Posts: 5664
Location: Dorchester County, South Carolina

Posted: Fri 09 Mar, 2012 2:21 pm

So how many rats & birds are locked up in jail in FL at this time ? Laughing

If a fruit drops from your tree & you don't pick it up and a seed sprouts, are you then breaking the law ? Shocked

_________________
Wal-Mart a great place to buy cheap plastic crap ! http://walmartwatch.com/ ...

Back to top
Darkman
Citruholic
Citruholic


Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 968
Location: Pensacola Florida South of I-10 Zone 8b/9a

Posted: Fri 09 Mar, 2012 6:13 pm

Laaz wrote:
So how many rats & birds are locked up in jail in FL at this time ? Laughing

If a fruit drops from your tree & you don't pick it up and a seed sprouts, are you then breaking the law ? Shocked


As long as you don't transport it across your yard you'll be ok! Laughing

That is the problem that I have with the current laws/rules. They threw an enormous blanket over the whole issue took a step back and said I can't see any problems, we're done here, let's go to the house. Now before someone jumps on me , yes, I'm being a bit sarcastic but I think every one knows what I'm saying. In the strictist sense once you plant your bought citrus in the ground it must remain there and not be transplanted. If I own a Ponkon and a Sunburst, which I do, and they are planted side by side but I wish to topwork one to the other I can't and that is just ridiculous BUT the blanket covers and hides all. All is well! AHMMM!

_________________
Charles in Pensacola

Life - Some assembly required, As is no warranty, Batteries not included, Instructions shipped separately and are frequently wrong!

Kentucky Bourbon - It may not solve the problem but it helps to make it tolerable!
Back to top
Citrus Growers Forum Index du Forum -> In ground citrus
Goto Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2
Informations
Qui est en ligne ? Our users have posted a total of 66068 messages
We have 3235 registered members on this websites
Most users ever online was 70 on Tue 30 Oct, 2012 10:12 am

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group