|
Citrus Growers Forum
This is the read-only version of the Citrus Growers Forum.
Breaking news: the Citrus Growers Forum is reborn from its ashes!
Citrus Growers v2.0
|
|
|
Ground cover in citrus orchard
Goto 1, 2, 3 Next
|
Author |
Message |
dauben Citruholic
Joined: 25 Nov 2006 Posts: 963 Location: Ramona, CA, Zone 9A
|
Posted: Thu 12 Feb, 2009 11:15 pm |
|
I'm doing some maintenance and mowing between the citrus trees in the orchard. Everything looks nice and green right now, but I want to get rid of the weeds and plant something between the rows in the orchard. Does anyone have any suggestions for something that might nitrogen fixating, drought resistant, choke out weeds, cheap, etc.
Thanks,
Phillip |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Millet Citruholic
Joined: 13 Nov 2005 Posts: 6657 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Fri 13 Feb, 2009 8:00 pm |
|
In citrus groves there are normally three systems of soil management ---clean cultivation, continuous cover crops, and a combination of these two. Cover crops (green manures) are grown in groves for the organic matter they add to the soil when turned under before they reach maturity. In soils that are naturally low in organic matter, cover crops benefit greatly by regular additions of it, and further, the ability of organic matter to support good tree growth. Other growers attempt to keep the soil constantly covered with grass , or a herbaceous crop in the summer, and a cold resistant crop during the winter months. Know that a permanent ground cover kept year around seriously competes with the trees for nutrients and moisture, and can create a fire hazard in winter. Groves where the soil is covered with vegetation, weeds or mulch, injury to the trees from frost or freezes is greater. Bare cultivated soil radiates heat more freely to the trees than soil covered with vegetation, and so prevents their reaching an injurious temperature as soon. Besides the greater fire danger during the dormant season, groves that keep a ground cover, have a higher pest problem. Plant bugs and grasshoppers are the pest most involved. Two general types of cover crops are used -- leguminous and non-leguminous. Some growers like to plant legumes for the nitrogen that legumes take from the air and deposit into the soil. While it is quite true that legumes do increase soil nitrogen, the amount is negligibly small, so that no difference is made in calculating fertilizer needs in groves with legume cover crops from those with other kinds. But, because of the of the rather small advantages and considerable disadvantages of legumes, many other growers prefer to make no special planting of a cover crop, and simply allow the native or naturalized weeds or cover the ground. I would either keep the soil cultivated bear, or as a second choice, simply plant a native grass, provided you have enough water allocation, to support both the ground cover, and your trees, as any permant ground crop will take a lot of moisture and nutrients from your trees. (Citrus Growing in Florida) - (Millet 1,436-) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dauben Citruholic
Joined: 25 Nov 2006 Posts: 963 Location: Ramona, CA, Zone 9A
|
Posted: Fri 13 Feb, 2009 8:12 pm |
|
Millet wrote: | In citrus groves there are normally three systems of soil management ---clean cultivation, continuous cover crops, and a combination of these two. |
Thanks Millet. I was thinking about a combination of the two. My thought was to keep the soil barren under the dripline so that I don't have to mow under the tree and then have some form of cover crop between the rows (more for cosmetic purposes). I bought a DR mower so mowing between the rows should be easy, but under the trees, I wanted to keep weed free.
On a side note, I wanted to use Roundup under the trees to kill the weeds. Does anyone know if Roundup poses a problem?
Thanks,
Phillip |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JoeReal Site Admin
Joined: 16 Nov 2005 Posts: 4726 Location: Davis, California
|
Posted: Fri 13 Feb, 2009 9:20 pm |
|
dauben wrote: |
On a side note, I wanted to use Roundup under the trees to kill the weeds. Does anyone know if Roundup poses a problem?
Phillip |
NaturalNews.com printable article
Originally published February 5 2009
The Hidden Dangers of Roundup
by Dr. Gregory Damato, Ph.D., citizen journalist
(NaturalNews) Roundup is the world`s most popular herbicide used to control weeds all over the planet and is omnipresent in the food chain of animals and humans. Roundup is claimed to have an active ingredient known as glyphosate (G) and said to be safe for humans even though plants are readily killed. In a first of its kind published study, French researchers recently sought to examine the toxicity of four popular G-based herbicide formulations on human placental cells, kidney cells, embryonic cells and neonate umbilical cord cells and surprisingly found total cell death of each of these cells within 24 hours.
As the percentage of genetically modified (GM) soy in the US burgeons to over 91 percent [1], researchers are beginning to publish harbingers for the potential of a maelstrom of future health problems from GMOs (genetically modified organisms) [2, 3]. One of the potential harmful triggers includes the increased amounts of chemicals present in the environment disseminating at an alarming rate with few researchers examining the combined effects of these xenobiotics on plants, animals or humans. Similarly, much of the existing research on GMOs has been undertaken on the individual organism itself and neglects to examine the more important ecological issue of synergism. This point is very notable because the world`s most popular herbicide known as Monsanto`s Roundup contains a blend of glyphosate (G) and several unknown adjuvants. The exact ingredients in Roundup are not disclosed to the general public and are kept confidential as they are labeled, "trade secrets". Monsanto assures the public these ingredients are inert and are therefore non-toxic. The most predominant adjuvant in Roundup seems to be polyethoxylated tallowamine or POEA [4, 5], which has been implicated in ocular burns, redness, swelling, blisters, nausea and diarhhea [6]. POEA is one of the most prevalent pollutants found in rivers all over the world. Problems begin to arise when G alone interacts with POEA and other unknown ingredients activating and accelerating the resultant mixture known as Roundup [7].
Monsanto patented its G propriety blend and named it Roundup in the 1970`s to kill broadleaf and cereal leave weeds. G is the active ingredient utilized in nearly 75% of all edible GM plants that have been engineered to tolerate high levels of this form of G [8]. G works by inhibiting an enzyme that synthesizes the amino acids tyrosine, tryptophan and phenylalanine thereby killing the weed. Researchers examining the amounts of herbicide used on GMO soy have concluded that the GMO soy typically receives several more pounds of G than conventionally grown soy per acre [9]. Furthermore, researchers have found that several types of newly created superweeds resistant to Roundup (e.g., pigweed, ryegrass and marestail) have been rapidly surfacing leading to increased amounts of Roundup on such crops [10]. These farmers have been told to use increasingly potent mixtures of herbicides and not Roundup alone [11]. In fact, there has been a more than 1900% increase in G use on Roundup Ready soybeans from 1994 to 2006 [12].
For the first time, French researchers recently sought to examine the toxicity of four G-based herbicide formulations on human placental cells, kidney cells, embryonic cells and neonate umbilical cord cells [13]. The researchers used the four most common types of Roundup utilized worldwide: Roundup Express, Roundup Bioforce, Roundup Grand Travaux and Roundup Grand Travaux Plus at lower concentration levels than would be normally found in plants and in animal feed. The researchers sought to determine the levels of necrosis (death of cells due to injury, disease or loss of blood supply) and apotosis (programmed cell death) of each of these cells based on exposure to various dilutions of each of the four Roundup products as well as G, POEA and AMPA (the main metabolite of G at 14 different concentrations of 10 ppm to 2%).
The researchers were surprised by the findings and reported that all four herbicides caused cellular death for all four types of cells within 24 hours. The researchers reported several mechanisms by which the herbicides caused the cells to die including: cell membrane rupture and damage, mitochondrial damage and cell asphyxia. Following these findings, the researchers tested G, AMPA and POEA by themselves and concluded that, "It is very clear that if G, POEA, or AMPA has a small toxic effect on embryonic cells alone at low levels, the combination of two of them at the same final concentration is significantly deleterious".
Although Monsanto claims that G metabolizes into a harmless and inert substance known as AMPA, the researchers found that AMPA was more toxic to human cells than G. This finding is very noteworthy considering AMPA is more stable and present in soil, plants, food and wastewater (2 to 35 ppm) compared with G (.1 to 3 ppm) [14]. AMPA was also found to synergistically increase the toxicity of G and POEA.
The researchers also reported that G acted very quickly at concentrations 500 to 1000 times lower than present agricultural levels to induce programmed cell death. G alone was found to induce mitochondrial toxicity without cell membrane damage. Furthermore, the researchers tested very weak concentrations (.005%) of Roundup and reported cell death, lack of adhesion, shrinking and fragmentation in the cells undergoing apoptosis. The embryonic cells were the most sensitive indicating another major reason to eat only organic foods while pregnant.
Although previous researchers have proposed that the supposed "inert ingredients" alter the role of cell membrane disruptors in fish, amphibians, microorganisms [15] and plants [16], independent of G, this study is the first of its kind to report similar findings in human cells and immediately calls for strict monitoring of the agricultural usage of Roundup. The researchers concluded that, "the proprietary mixtures available on the market could cause cell damage and even death around residual levels to be expected, especially in food and feed derived from R [Roundup] formulation-treated crops".
References
1.GMO Compass. USA: Cultivations of GM plants in 2007. 2008 [cited January 15, 2009]; Available from: http://www.gmo-compass.org/eng/agri....
2.Finamore, A., et al., Intestinal and peripheral immune response to MON810 maize ingestion in weaning and old mice. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 2008. 56: p. 11533-11539.
3.Velimirov, A., et al., Biological effects of transgenic maize NK603xMON810 fed in long term reproduction studies in mice. Unpublished study: Institute fur Ernahrung, Austria., November 11, 2008.
4.Acquavella, J.F., et al., Human occular effects frim self-reported exposures to Roundup herbicides. Human & Experimental Toxicology, 1999. 18: p. 479-486.
5.Williams, G.M., Kroe, R., & Munro, I.C. Safety evaluation and risk assessment of the herbicide Roundup and active ingredient, glyphosate, for humans Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 200. 31: p. 117-165.
6.Tsui, M.T. & Chu, L.M. Aquatic toxicity of glyphosate based formulations: Comparisons between different organisms and the effect of environmental factors. Chemosphere, 2003. 52: p. 1189-1197.
7.Cox, C., Glyphosate (Roundup). Journal of Pesticide Reform, 1998. 18: p. 3-17.
8.Clive, J., The global status of the commercialized biotechnoligical/genetically modified crop: 2006. Tsitol. Genet., 2007. 41: p. 10-12.
9.Duffy, M., Does planting GMO seed boost farmer`s profits? Leopold Letter, 1999. 11: p. 1-5.
10.Benbrook, C.M. Genetically engineered crops and pesticide use in the United States. BioTech InfoNet Technical Paper Number 7, October 2004.
11.Nice, G., B. Johnson, and T. Bauman, A little burndown madness. Pest & Crop, 2008. 7.
12.Center for Food Safety. Agricultural pesticide use in U.S. agriculture: Why USDA-NASS agricultural chemical reporting is important. May 2008: Washington, DC.
13.Benachour, N. & Seralini, G.E. Glyphosate formulations induce apoptosis and necrosis in human umbilical, embryonic, and placental cells. Chemical Research in Toxicology, In Press.
14.Ghanem, A., et al., Glyphosate and AMPA analysis in sewage sludge by LC-ESI-MS/MS after FMOC derivation on strong anion-exchange resin as solid support. Annals of Chemistry, 2007. 79: p. 3794-3801.
15.Cox, C. & Surgan, M. Unidentified inert ingredients in pesticides: Implications for human and environmental health. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2006. 114: p. 1803-1806.
16.Haefs, R., et al., Studies on a new group of biodegradable surfactants for glyphosate. Pesticide Management in Science, 2006. 58: p. 825-833.
About the author
Dr. Gregory Damato enjoys a vegan lifestyle and runs a Quantum Biofeedback clinic treating various clients ranging from autism to cancer. He is currently authoring a book for parents educating on the many hidden dangers of vaccines, chemical toxicity in toys, GM foods, the effects of EMFs and EMRs and ways to combat rising childhood illness and neurological disease by naturally building immunity, detoxification and nutrition. His goal is to increase global awareness of the myriad of health issue facing us today and the fact that 100% of them are preventable and completely reversible. His website publishes the latest health and wellness news and information and can be found at www.wellnessuncovered.com. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dauben Citruholic
Joined: 25 Nov 2006 Posts: 963 Location: Ramona, CA, Zone 9A
|
Posted: Sat 14 Feb, 2009 2:20 pm |
|
Thanks Joe. I'd be interested to see how the tests were performed and if any secondary exposure (say spraying weeds around grapefruit trees and then eating grapefruit showed any problems). I'd also be curious as to the half life of G and AMPA. I'll have to do a web search.
Thanks,
Phillip |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Millet Citruholic
Joined: 13 Nov 2005 Posts: 6657 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Sat 14 Feb, 2009 5:10 pm |
|
With due respect of views other than mine, I use Round Up, as it allows me to spray close to the trunks of trees and around the vines in my vineyard, without the danger of killing the tree or the grapes. I can use it in the farm fields, without sterilizing the soil for extended periods of time. I personally think Round Up offers outstanding weed control, while at the same time offering a level of safety not offered by other herbicides. I will continue to use it, without any concern for my health at all. Breathing the air in Denver, and other large American cities, is probably a 1000 times worse for a person's well being. As Joe's post states, Round Up is by far, and by a very wide margin, the #1 herbicide used by farms in eastern Colorado (my area). Everything in life is a trade off. - Millet (1,435-) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JoeReal Site Admin
Joined: 16 Nov 2005 Posts: 4726 Location: Davis, California
|
Posted: Sat 14 Feb, 2009 5:59 pm |
|
I still use RoundUp but with very extreme care and precautions. Studies like those that I posted are worth looking into further. The studies should be scrutinized. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dauben Citruholic
Joined: 25 Nov 2006 Posts: 963 Location: Ramona, CA, Zone 9A
|
Posted: Sat 14 Feb, 2009 6:18 pm |
|
JoeReal wrote: | I still use RoundUp but with very extreme care and precautions. Studies like those that I posted are worth looking into further. The studies should be scrutinized. |
True. Sometimes the studies don't reflect how a product is actually used. They may have submersed something in Roundup and determined that it caused cell destruction, but when sprayed on grass and not in contact with soft tissues, it may be fine. Engine oil may cause cancer if ingested, but it doesn't mean I would stop using it my car.
Phillip |
|
Back to top |
|
|
softmentor
Joined: 25 Aug 2008 Posts: 22 Location: Indio CA
|
Posted: Fri 30 Oct, 2009 9:32 am |
|
Well, it's been a long time since I chimed in but here I am. First, the use of mulch and green cover crops in Florida is very different that in CA. Since you are in San Diego, I think the case for both is much stronger.
I use to keep green middles but now my trees are large and there just isn't room between them. When young though, it was as big help. I would cut the green cover and rake it under the trees as mulch. I used a mix of Alfalfa and annual rye. Alfalfa seed can be hard to get unless you know a hay farmer. You can also use white clover, but Alfalfa is by far the leader in nitrogen fixing. All legumes will fix more nitrogen when the right bacteria is present so see if you can get the inoculate too.
Mulch is really more important that green cover. Good mulch adds nutrients to the soil while also helping to bring down the PH (which makes more nutrients available too), helps to regulate water saturation and keeps soil temperatures more even. I use a foot thick layer all around the tree, but not touching the trunk, for the first year. Then each year after that I add about 6 inches worth to "top dress" over what remains of the old mulch. That really does the trick for me. My trees are healthy green and prolific.
Round up? this is the organic board? Round up AARRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGG NO NO NO NO NO NO _________________ Sunset zone 13. Mulch and the right amount of water fixes almost everything. Nothin's sweeter that a drink from your own well. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cristofre Citruholic
Joined: 09 Mar 2010 Posts: 200 Location: Clayton, Georgia USA zone 7B/8A
|
Posted: Wed 11 May, 2011 3:09 pm |
|
This is the organic forum??? Roundup = chemicals.
(Not to mention that Roundups' maker, Monsanto, is EVIL): http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/04/26/eveningnews/main4048288.shtml
What are weeds? They are opportunistic plants that do exactly what nature intends them to do. Nature abhors bare dirt, its not natural.
Large tracts of identical plants out in the open are exactly what attracts insect pests and weeds.
Roundup works by subverting nature and natural processes. The longer you use it, the more you have to use it.
A natural organic system benefits from the relationships between plants and poisons are not necessary.
As example: Who sprays Roundup in forests or other natural areas to keep the weeds down? No one, because it is not necessary, there are no weeds!
Citrus can be grown organically with beneficial cover crops and other permaculture techniques.
Sepp Holzer: http://www.superconsciousness.com/topics/environment/earth-mind
Masanobu Fukuoka: http://www.permaculture.com/node/140 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
avinyard Citruholic
Joined: 13 Jul 2009 Posts: 27 Location: Austin, TX
|
Posted: Thu 12 May, 2011 6:56 pm |
|
You have to weight the costs versus the benefits for you. If your crop is your living, then I would not fault you for ensuring the best crop possible by using the most effective tools. If it is your hobby, then I suggest going the harder, less productive route. In my opinion agro chemicals are for agro businesses, and not for the home grower. The home grower doesn't need the highest yield possible. I think the healthier yield is better. Safe is relative. Round-up is relatively safe, but I'd still prefer not to consume it if I don't have to. No synthetic chemical floating around in your body is a good thing. Eliminate your exposures where you can. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cristofre Citruholic
Joined: 09 Mar 2010 Posts: 200 Location: Clayton, Georgia USA zone 7B/8A
|
Posted: Fri 13 May, 2011 10:44 am |
|
avinyard wrote: | You have to weight the costs versus the benefits for you. If your crop is your living, then I would not fault you for ensuring the best crop possible by using the most effective tools. If it is your hobby, then I suggest going the harder, less productive route. In my opinion agro chemicals are for agro businesses, and not for the home grower. The home grower doesn't need the highest yield possible. I think the healthier yield is better. Safe is relative. Round-up is relatively safe, but I'd still prefer not to consume it if I don't have to. No synthetic chemical floating around in your body is a good thing. Eliminate your exposures where you can. |
I think it is all about state of mind. You are right, "agrobusiness" is about extracting every little bit of profit from your land as soon as possible... but the land be damned. The thing is, it doesn't have to be that way. In the long run, the land is exhausted of its fertility by agrobiz techniques, and one has to scale up the amount of fertilizers and poisons necessary to make dead land produce a crop.
There is no reason organic farming has to be less productive.
For example:
Masanoubu Fukuoka raised citrus and rice in Japan and had equal or better yields than his neighbors without chemicals, tractors or even tilling AND his land became more fertile each passing year, not less. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Millet Citruholic
Joined: 13 Nov 2005 Posts: 6657 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Tue 13 Sep, 2011 6:11 pm |
|
Several months ago I added an organic mulch under my greenhouse Cara Cara and Marisol Clementine tree. The mulch was made up of things that I normally clean out of the greenhouse (leaves, weeds, trimmings, etc.). I understand that mulch around citrus is not considered a good idea, but I thought I would mulch the two trees as an experiment. The mulch did, of course, keep the soil moist and I'm sure had some advantages. One day I pulled back the mulch to check the soil, and was amazed at the thousands of various bugs that were living under there. It was unbelievable. I had no idea that that number of pill bugs (rolly polly) bugs existed in the would, plus other types that I have no idea what they were. I have since removed all the mulch, to the compost pile outside, and gone back to clean cultivation. - Millet (489-) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laaz Site Owner
Joined: 12 Nov 2005 Posts: 5651 Location: Dorchester County, South Carolina
|
Posted: Tue 13 Sep, 2011 6:21 pm |
|
Pine straw... _________________ Wal-Mart a great place to buy cheap plastic crap ! http://walmartwatch.com/ ...
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Darkman Citruholic
Joined: 20 Jul 2010 Posts: 966 Location: Pensacola Florida South of I-10 Zone 8b/9a
|
Posted: Tue 13 Sep, 2011 10:14 pm |
|
Millet wrote: | One day I pulled back the mulch to check the soil, and was amazed at the thousands of various bugs that were living under there. It was unbelievable. I had no idea that that number of pill bugs (rolly polly) bugs existed in the would, plus other types that I have no idea what they were. - Millet (489-) |
I have tons of leaves in my garden BUT not up around my Citrus trees. I believe strongly in the mulching of plants and would have done so except for the advice of this forum. If you rake back my mulch you will see the cousins of Millets bugs AND this makes me happy because I know all is well. I know that these bugs are devouring my mulch into organic gold. When my plants get bigger I will slowly bring in the mulch but I will always maintain a small ring of cleared ground around the trunk. I believe that the mulch will in time make a stronger healthier tree and reduce the need for watering. _________________ Charles in Pensacola
Life - Some assembly required, As is no warranty, Batteries not included, Instructions shipped separately and are frequently wrong!
Kentucky Bourbon - It may not solve the problem but it helps to make it tolerable! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Informations |
|
Our users have posted a total of 66068 messages We have 3235 registered members on this websites
|
Most users ever online was 70 on Tue 30 Oct, 2012 10:12 am |
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|