Just did some googling in the search for answer to my own such question, and have found this topic.
Source of my confusion was
"At the present the only Citrus trifoliata clone whose behaviour is sufficiently well established to warrant naming is Rubidoux..."
from "Citrus Pages" at
http://users.kymp.net/citruspages/trifoliates.html
and hence the question "Why?"
Text cited above can be found also here
http://www.citrusvariety.ucr.edu/citrus/rubidoux_trifoliate.html
pointing to the source: "The Citrus Industry Vol. 1 (1967)"
http://lib.ucr.edu/agnic/webber/Vol1/Chapter4.html#trifoliate
Consequence could be that "Rubidoux" is more often then others used in scientific experiments, quite recent one as example:
Boava
et al., 2011., "Global gene expression of Poncirus trifoliata, Citrus sunki and their hybrids under infection of Phytophthora parasitica"
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/12/39
Older one with interesting use of "Rubidoux":
Moreira
et al., 2002., "Inheritance of Organelle DNA Sequences in a CitrusPoncirus Intergeneric Cross"
http://jhered.oxfordjournals.org/content/93/3/174.full
... DNA of the cultivar Rubidoux was used to identify P. trifoliata-unique organelle DNA configurations. We do not know if the paternal tree was identical to Rubidoux in all mtDNA configurations, but the maternal tree was available for analysis..."
My conclusion, combining Millets answer and my observation, is:
There is nothing special about "Rubidoux" wrt other PT varietes,
"Rubidoux" is simply taken, by scientific community, to be representative one for PT as a whole.