This report points out that the source nursery (not the store, but where trees were grown) could have phenotypic influence on the actual performance of your trees in response to the growing conditions of the final environment where they are planted.
This brings to mind that there could be some effect on fruit quality and performance based on the various sources of budwoods. Even nucellar trees, although genetically identical to the female parent, it could respond using different set of genes from where the nucellar seedlings are grown and then propagated afterwards. Even if you have the best tasting citrus grown in one place in California, then clones of it and grow elsewhere, it would perform differently. And if you have different places where the same cultivar was grown, and they have been established for a long time, then take budwoods from them, expect those different sourced budwoods to perform differently when planted in the same location. Gene Lester at one point insisted on getting Bream Tarocco blood orange, and he could be right, that even if this is genetically the same as the other Tarocco listed, the performance is different.
These nursery effects has been verified by this study. We expect each nursery growing and propagating their trees in different environment, and we can't expect the same cultivar sourced from different nurseries to perform the same way. And this is popularly coined as "Nursery Effect", and has been mentioned to certain extent by the citrus gurus here in this forum. But, even with one nursery store we can still see the same effects if they have several propagating locations, so we can no longer expect that each fruit tree, even if the same cultivar, would expect to behave uniformly when planted in the same location, and they sourced from the same company or store.
Read the interesting article, and it is applicable to almost many fruit trees propagated asexually. It has just confirmed my speculation and they have proven it true, at least in the case of poplars.
Joe Real
Forest Trees Remember Their Roots
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/07/110711164557.htm
ScienceDaily (July 11, 2011) When it comes to how they respond to the environment, trees may not be that different from humans. Recent studies showed that even genetically identical human twins can have a different chance of getting a disease. This is because each twin has distinct personal experiences through their lifetime.
It turns out that the same is likely true for forest trees as well, according to new research from the University of Toronto Scarborough (UTSC).
"The findings were really quite stunning," says Malcolm Campbell, a biologist and lead author of the study. "People have been talking about a so-called "nursery effect" for a long time."
The study looked at the theory that trees and other plants, even when they were genetically identical, grew differently and responded to stress differently depending on the nursery that the plants were obtained from. Campbell says the research findings not only provide a strong affirmation of this effect, but also reveal insight on a molecular level. "Our results show that there is a form of molecular 'memory' in trees where a tree's previous personal experience influences how it responds to the environment."
In the new study, Campbell's graduate student Sherosha Raj used genetically identical poplar trees that had been grown in two different regions of Canada. These stem cuttings were then used to regrow the trees under identical climate-controlled conditions in Toronto. Raj subjected half of the trees to drought conditions while the remaining trees were well watered.
Since the trees were regrown under identical conditions, Campbell and his research group predicted all the specimens would respond to drought in the same manner, regardless of where they had come from. Remarkably, genetically identical specimens of two poplar varieties responded differently to the drought treatment depending on their place of origin.
Campbell's research group also showed that this difference occurred at the most fundamental level -- the one of gene activity. Even though the specimens were all genetically identical, trees that had been obtained from Alberta used a different set of genes to respond to drought than the ones that had been obtained from Saskatchewan.
The findings of this study are relevant to foresters and gardeners in highlighting the importance of the nursery source for trees and other plants, which can determine how the plant will grow and resist stress in a forest or the garden. Additionally, the "memory" of previous experience discovered in this study could also help determine plant survival in response to changes in climate, or other environmental stresses like diseases or pests.
Dr. Campbell's research team included co-first author Dr. Katharina Bräutigam, Erin Hamnishi and Dr. Olivia Wilkins, all of the University of Toronto. The work was done in collaboration with colleagues at the University of British Columbia, Simon Fraser University, and the University of Alberta.
The research was supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada competitive research funds, and in kind contributions from Alberta Pacific Forest Industries, and Agriculture and Agrifood Canada.
The study appears in this week's issue of PNAS: The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Email or share this story:
Story Source:
The above story is reprinted (with editorial adaptations by ScienceDaily staff) from materials provided by University of Toronto Scarborough, via EurekAlert!, a service of AAAS.
Journal Reference:
Sherosha Raj, Katharina Bräutigam, Erin T. Hamanishi, Olivia Wilkins, Barb R. Thomas, William Schroeder, Shawn D. Mansfield, Aine L. Plant, and Malcolm M. Campbell. Clone history shapes Populus drought responses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, July 11, 2011 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1103341108
