Author |
Message |
dauben Citruholic
Joined: 25 Nov 2006 Posts: 963 Location: Ramona, CA, Zone 9A
|
Posted: Sun 16 Sep, 2007 2:57 pm |
|
After the frost we had in January, I was hoping it zapped the leaf miners, but they are back with a vengance. I can't keep up with the Spinosad spraying. My seedlings are getting hit too. I also don't like the price our local nursery has on Spinosad. Anyone know of a cheaper source?
Phillip |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laaz Site Owner
Joined: 12 Nov 2005 Posts: 5670 Location: Dorchester County, South Carolina
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dauben Citruholic
Joined: 25 Nov 2006 Posts: 963 Location: Ramona, CA, Zone 9A
|
Posted: Sun 16 Sep, 2007 5:13 pm |
|
Wow!! Season long control!!! Only question is that I noticed that citrus isn't one of the listed fruit trees for it's use. Does bayer have a more detailed list that includes citrus? I have small children that would be eating the fruit so I would want to make sure it's safe.
Thanks!!
Phillip |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laaz Site Owner
Joined: 12 Nov 2005 Posts: 5670 Location: Dorchester County, South Carolina
|
Posted: Sun 16 Sep, 2007 6:21 pm |
|
As I said "non producing trees" I do not use it on trees that are producing fruit. The trees that are freshly budded or seedlings that will not produce fruit for a while are the trees that get this treatment. It allows the new budding to flourish without the impact of leafminer attack.... _________________ Wal-Mart a great place to buy cheap plastic crap ! http://walmartwatch.com/ ...
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ned Citrus Guru
Joined: 14 Nov 2005 Posts: 999 Location: Port Royal, SC (Zone 8b)
|
Posted: Sun 16 Sep, 2007 9:11 pm |
|
Conserve SC is a more concentrated form of spinosad. I see it on ebay for for $99.00 a quart. You might be able to reduce that if someone would go in with you. I also saw a 4 oz container for $25.00.
I use it and it works very well, but you must time applications to growth flushes. You are limited to 6 applications per year.
http://www.entomology.umn.edu/cues/cwlb/labels/ConserveSC.pdf |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dauben Citruholic
Joined: 25 Nov 2006 Posts: 963 Location: Ramona, CA, Zone 9A
|
Posted: Fri 21 Sep, 2007 9:24 pm |
|
Thanks Ned. When speaking of the growth flushes, do the leaf miners only go after new growth? That is what I'm noticing, but I obviously don't want to spend any more than I have to by spraying when it isn't needed.
Thanks,
Phillip |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Skeeter Moderator
Joined: 23 Jul 2006 Posts: 2218 Location: Pensacola, FL zone 9
|
Posted: Fri 21 Sep, 2007 11:23 pm |
|
Yes Phillip, the miners lay their eggs on the leaves when they are about 1/2 inch. I have never been able to spot the eggs, but I have seen the larvae-- I can now spot them with the naked eye just before I squash them!
I do use the spinosad when they get bad, but I rely on the oil spray more than the spinosad-- you just have to keep up with the new growth and keep it coated so the adults do not lay eggs on the young leaves. _________________ Skeet
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
karpes Citruholic
Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 379 Location: South Louisiana
|
Posted: Sat 22 Sep, 2007 9:28 am |
|
Skeet
Do you spray oil only on the new sprouts each week? I tried the Bayer Advance a couple years ago and did not see the results that I had expected. It does take a while for the product to make its way throughout the tree so maybe I applied too late. However the second round of their attack much later was as bad as if I had not used it at all.
I called Bayer and they adamantly told me that Bayer Advance was not labeled for any Citrus. I thought that it was peculiar since other countries have use it on citrus.
Karl |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laaz Site Owner
Joined: 12 Nov 2005 Posts: 5670 Location: Dorchester County, South Carolina
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Skeeter Moderator
Joined: 23 Jul 2006 Posts: 2218 Location: Pensacola, FL zone 9
|
Posted: Sat 22 Sep, 2007 9:55 am |
|
Karl, Yes, I spray the oil only on the new growth and depending on weather or growth rate of the flush, I may spray 2 or even 3 times a week if it rains or if the growth is really fast.
I know that Bayer has imidacloprid which is the same active ingredient as several other products that are labled for citrus, but they cannot endorse any application that is not listed on the actual lable. There may be differences in the formulation, or they may have another product that is designed for citrus (more expensive probably) and did not want to include citrus on the lable for Bayer Tree and Shrub.
For me, given that the product is suppose to protect the tree from insects for a yr, it makes me wonder how long the product actually stays in the tree at a level I would not want to consume, but not sufficient to kill bugs. _________________ Skeet
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
karpes Citruholic
Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 379 Location: South Louisiana
|
Posted: Sat 22 Sep, 2007 10:51 am |
|
Lazz
The product that I used was Bayer Advanced Garden Tree and Shrub Insect control with 1.47% Imidacloprid and 98.53% other ingredients
After reading this article at the LSU agcenter about Admire Pro, I jumped to the conclusion that the main ingredient Imidacloprid was the same in both products. This was my argument to Bayer, but they quickly told me that the problem was not the Imidacloprid, but in the other 98.53%. If you read the label on the Bayer advance you can see that it does not say inert ingredients but other ingredients.
I hope that you are not as confused about this as I was at the time, but since them I read the labels and I dont deviate or make my own conclusions. I am not trying to scare anyone but just want you to have the facts, as I know them.
Karl
LSU article on Admire Pro
http://www.lsuagcenter.com/en/family_home/hazards_and_threats/recovery_assistance/agriculture/crops/Citrus+Leaf+Miner+Management.htm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dauben Citruholic
Joined: 25 Nov 2006 Posts: 963 Location: Ramona, CA, Zone 9A
|
Posted: Sun 03 Feb, 2008 4:00 am |
|
Laaz wrote: | As I said "non producing trees" I do not use it on trees that are producing fruit. The trees that are freshly budded or seedlings that will not produce fruit for a while are the trees that get this treatment. It allows the new budding to flourish without the impact of leafminer attack.... |
I got to thinking about this post a while back and I started using a systemic pesticide to control leafminer on my rootstock seedlings now growing. The one thought I had though was the for trees that are producing fruit, what if I waited until all of the fruit was gone and sprayed the tree shortly thereafter. It is supposed to control the pests for an entire year, but it will be almost one full year until the tree has edible fruit again. Does anyone have any thoughts as to the toxicity of this pesticide after a year goes by?
Phillp |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Skeeter Moderator
Joined: 23 Jul 2006 Posts: 2218 Location: Pensacola, FL zone 9
|
Posted: Sun 03 Feb, 2008 1:01 pm |
|
I looked up some of the data on it--it is considered moderately toxic, but the bad news is the 1/2 life in aerobic soil is almost 3 years (997 days)--so nearly 1/4 of it could still be around 6 years later. It is not likely to be a carcinogen.
The mode of action is to turn on nerve synapse, but unlike OPs, it cannot be turned off. _________________ Skeet
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dauben Citruholic
Joined: 25 Nov 2006 Posts: 963 Location: Ramona, CA, Zone 9A
|
Posted: Sun 03 Feb, 2008 3:39 pm |
|
Skeeter wrote: | I looked up some of the data on it--it is considered moderately toxic, but the bad news is the 1/2 life in aerobic soil is almost 3 years (997 days)--so nearly 1/4 of it could still be around 6 years later. It is not likely to be a carcinogen.
The mode of action is to turn on nerve synapse, but unlike OPs, it cannot be turned off. |
I was looking into another systemic by Spectricide that contains Dinotefuran http://www.spectracide.com/ProductCategories/RoseAndFlowerCare/SpectracideTreeShrub/ProductLabels/default.htm. I believe it has a half life of approximately 50-100 days. From an EPA datasheet says it's allowed on "leafy vegetables" but it sounds like like there is some toxicity:
Quote: |
Acute Toxicity
Technical dinotefuran has low acute toxicity by the oral (toxicity category IV), dermal (toxicity category IV), and inhalation (toxicity category IV) routes. It is not a dermal sensitizer, causes a low level of skin irritation (toxicity category IV) and moderate eye irritation (toxicity category II) .
Carcinogenicity
Subchronic and Chronic Toxicity
The main target tissues are the nervous system and the immune system, with effects seen in several species. Nervous system toxicity is manifested as clinical signs and decreased motor activity seen after acute dosing (in both rats and rabbits) and increased motor activity seen after repeated dosing; these findings are consistent with effects on the nicotinic cholinergic nervous system.
Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity
No adverse effects in fetuses were seen in the developmental toxicity studies in rats or rabbits, at maternally toxic doses, and offspring (including decreased spleen and thymus weights, and decreased grip strength) effects in the reproduction study occurred at the same doses causing parental effects. There was a qualitative increase in sensitivity in rat pups in the reproductive toxicity study.
Immune System Toxicity
Immune system toxicity is manifested as decreases in spleen and thymus weights seen in multiple studies and species (including dogs, rats, and mice). There are also indications of endocrine-related toxicity, manifested in the reproductive toxicity study (in rats) as decreases in primordial follicles and altered cyclicity in females, abnormal sperm parameters in males; changes in testes or ovary weight were also seen in several species (mouse, dog, and rat).
Carcinogenicity
Dinotefuran has been classified as Not likely to be carcinogenic to humans. This classification is based on the lack of evidence for carcinogenicity in mice and rats.
Mutagenicity
Submitted studies were found to be acceptable. There is no concern for mutagenicity resulting from exposure to dinotefuran. |
Phillip |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Skeeter Moderator
Joined: 23 Jul 2006 Posts: 2218 Location: Pensacola, FL zone 9
|
Posted: Sun 03 Feb, 2008 7:53 pm |
|
Toxicity on that one is lower--over 2000 mg/Kg in mouse. It is probably safer than imidacloprid, and does have a much shorter half life. _________________ Skeet
|
|
Back to top |
|
|